Paramétrage de la méthode mrp en environnement incertain : une revue de la littérature

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.53102/2011.30.01.808

Mots-clés :

MRP, Simulation, Plan d'expérience, Indicateurs de performance

Résumé

 Ce papier est une revue de la littérature sur le thème « MRP (Material Requirement Planning) en environnement incertain ». Depuis les années 70, de nombreuses recherches ont été menées pour l'amélioration de la performance des systèmes MRP. Cette performance est affectée par les incertitudes endogènes et exogènes du système de production. Privilégiant la résolution de problème du paramétrage du système de production, cette revue combine les contextes de décision, les paramètres d'action et les effets induits sur les indicateurs de performance. Sur cette base, 78 articles et 7 états de l'art ont été recensés, s'étalant de 1976 à 2010. Donnant un point de départ aux chercheurs et praticiens en gestion de production, cette revue se propose de construire, de représenter et d'analyser la liste exhaustive des paramètres d'action (PA), des indicateurs de performance (IP) et des relations PA-IP étudiés. La nature, les limites des résultats des travaux bibliographiques et la généralisation potentielle de ces résultats sont également discutées. Enfin, une nouvelle direction de recherche est proposée.

Biographies des auteurs

David Damand, Humanis EM Strasbourg

David Damand est Maitre de Conférences en science de gestion à l’EM Strasbourg (Université de Strasbourg) et chercheur au laboratoire HUMANIS. Il enseigne la gestion de production. Ses travaux de recherche portent sur l’aide à la décision en planification de système de production et sur la conception d’entrepôt logistique.

Voir plus

Marc Barth, INSA-Strasbourg, Humanis EM Strasbourg

Marc Barth est maître de conférences habilité à diriger les recherches à l’INSA de Strasbourg et son laboratoire d’accueil est Humanis de l’EM Strasbourg. Ses travaux concernent la modélisation pour la conception et l’amélioration des systèmes de la supply chain.

Voir plus

Références

[AGA 94] Agarwal, G., Subash B. A., 1994. A simulation study of performance of MRP based systems under interaction effects. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 5 (1), 30-46.

[BAI 02] Bai, X., David, J. S., Kanet, J. J., Cantrell, S., Patterson, J. W., 2002. Schedule instability, service level and cost in an material requirements planning system. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (7), 1725-58.

[BAR 03] Barth, M., Damand, D., De Guio R., 2003. How Can we Ascertain, Understand and Interpret the Performance Level of a Production System? A Visual Method: "the Plan of Preferences". International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 14 (3), 233-43.

[BEL 96] Belton, V., Elder, M.D., 1996. Exploring a multicriteria approach to production scheduling. International Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47 (1), 162-74.

[BIG 80] Biggs, J. R., Hahn, C. K., Pinto, P. A., 1980. Performance of Lot-Sizing Rules In an MRP System With Different Operating Conditions. Academy of Management Review, 5 (1), 89-96.

[BIG 85] Biggs, J. R., 1985. Priority rules for shop floor control in a material requirements system under varions levels of capacity. International journal of Production Research, 23 (1), 33-46.

[BLA 80] Blackburn J. D., Millen R. A., 1980. Heuristics lot-sizing performance in a rolling schedule environment. Decision Sciences, 11 (4), 691-701.

[BLA 85] Blackburn J. D., Kropp D. H., Millen, R. A., 1985. MRP system nervousness : Causes and cures. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 9 (1-3), 141-46.

[BLA 86] Blackburn, J. D., Kropp, D. H., Millen, R. A., 1986. A comparison of strategies to dampen nervousness in MRP systems. Management Science, 32 (4), 413-29.

[BRA 99] Bragg, D.J., Duplaga, E.A., Watts, A., 1999. The effects of partial order release and component reservation on inventory and customer service performance in an MRP environment. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (3), 523-38.

[BRE 93] Brennan, L., Gupta, S.M., 1993. A structured analysis of material requirements planning systems under combined demand and supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (7), 1349-62.

[BUZ 94] Buzacott, J.A., Shanthikumar, J.G., 1994. Safety stock versus safety lime in MRP controlled production systems. Management Science, 40 (12), 1678-89.

[BYR 94] Byrne, M.D., Jackson, R.J., 1994. A study of bottlenecks in a MRP environment using simulation". International Journal of Economics, 35 (1-3), 115-120.

[CAM 71] Campbell, K.L., 1971. Scheduling is not the problem. Journal of production and inventory management, 12 (3), 53-77.

[CAM 95] Campbell, G.M., 1995. Establishing safety stocks for master production schedules. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 6 (5), 404-12.

[CAR 79] Carlson, C. J., Jucker, J. V., Kropp, D. H., 1979. Less nervousness MRP systems: a dynamic economic lot sizing approach. Management Science, 25 (8), 754-61.

[CHU 88] Chu, C. H., Hayya J. C., 1988. Buffering decisions under MRP environment: A review. Management Science (Omega), 16 (4), 325-31.

[COX 98] Cox J. F., Blackstone, J. H., 2005. Apics Dictionary, 9th (VA, USA: APICS, the Educational Society for Resource Management).

[DAM 03] Damand D., Barth M. De Guio R., 2003. Comment découvrir, comprendre, et interpréter les performances d'un système de production ? Une méthode visuelle : "Le plan des préférences", Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle 22 (4).

[DOL 02] Dolgui, A., Ould-Louly, M.-A., 2002. A model for supply planning under lead time uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 78 (2), 145-52.

[DOL 07] Dolgui, A., Prodhon, C., 2007. Supply planning under uncertainties in MRP environments: A state of the art. Annual Reviews in Control, 31 (2), 269-79.

[ENN 01]-Enns, S. T., 2001. MRP performance effects due to lot size and planned lead time settings. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (3), 461-480.

[ENN 02]Enns, S. T., 2002. MRP performance effects due to forecast bias and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 138 (1), 87-102.

[GAL 94] Galbraith, L., Standridge, C.R., 1994. Analysis in manufacturing systems simulation: a case study. Simulation, 63 (6), 369-76.

[GAR 93-a] Gardiner, S.C., Blackstone, J.H., 1993. The effects of lot sizing and dispatching on customer service in an MRP environment. Journal of Operations Management, 11 (2), 143-59.

[GAR 93-b] Gardiner, S.C., Blackstone, J.H., 1993. Impact of lot-sizing on the financial performance of dispatching techniques in an MRP-planned fabrication and assembly environment. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (7), 1595-610.

[GAR 95] Gardiner S.C., Blackstone, J.H., 1995. Setups and effective capacity: the impact of lot sizing techniques in an MRP environment. Production Planning and Control, 6 (1), 26-38.

[GEN 08] Genin, P., Lamouri, S., Thomas, A., 2008. Multi-facilities tactical planning robustness with experimental design. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 19 (2), 171-82.

[GUI 00] Guide, V. D. R, Srivastava, R., 2000. A review of techniques for buffering against uncertainty with MRP systems. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 11 (3), 223-33.

[GUN 93] Gunasekaran, A., Martikainen, T., Yli-011i, P., 1993. Modelling the effect of demand variations on the performance of a production system. International Journal of Systems Science, 24 (7), 1349-62.

[GUP 93] Gupta, M.C., Gupta, Y.P., Evans, G.W., 1993. Operations planning and scheduling problems in advanced manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (4), 869¬900. Explaining observed productivity differentials between plants: implications for operations research

[GUP 95] Gupta, S. M., Brennan, L., 1995. MRP systems under supply and process uncertainty in an integrated shop floor control environnent. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (1), 205-20.

[HAY 85] Hayes, R.H., Clark, K.B, 1985. Explaining observed productivity differentials between plants: implications for operations research. Interfaces, 15 (6), 3-14.

[HNA 09] Hnaien, F., Delorme, X., Dolgui, A., 2010. Multi-objective optimization for inventory control in two-level assembly systems under uncertainty of lead times. Computers & Operations Research, 37 (11), 1835-43.

[HO 01] Ho, C. -J., Kim, S. -C., Koo, M., 2001. MRP system performance under lumpy demand environments. International Journal of Planning and Control, 12 (4), 316-25.

[HO 02] Ho, C. -J., 2002. Evaluating dampening effects of alternative lot-sizing rules to reduce MRP system nervousness. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (11), 2633-52.

[HO 05] Ho, C. -J., 2005. Examining dampening effects for alternative dampening procedures to cope with system nervousness. International Journal of Production Research, 43, (19), 4009-33.

[HO 07-a] Ho, C. -J., 2007. Exploring the compatibility of dampening procedures and lot-sizing rules in MRP systems under uncertain operating environments. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (18), 5097-120.

[HO 07-b] Ho, C. -J., Solis A. O., Chang Y. L., 2007. An evaluation of lot-sizing heuristics for deteriorating inventory in material requirements planning systems. Computers & Operations Research, 34 (9), 2562-75.

[HO 89] Ho, C. -J., 1989. Evaluating the impact of operating environments on MRP system nervousness. Computers & Operations Research, 27 (7), 1115-35.

[HO 92] Ho, C. J., 1992. An examination of a distribution resource planning problem: DRP system nervousness. Journal of business Logistics, 13, (2), 125-52.

[HO 93-a] Ho, C.J., 1993. Evaluating lot-sizing performance in MRP systems. A

comparative analysis of multiple performance. International Journal of Operations & Production, 13 (11), 52-79.

[HO 93-b] Ho, C.J., Ireland T.C., 1993. A diagnostic analysis of the impact of forecast errors on production planning via MRP system nervousness. Production Planning and Control, 4 (4), 311-22.

[HO 94-a] Ho, C.J., 1994. Evaluating the impact of frequent engineering changes on MRP system performance. International Journal of Production Research, 32 (3), 619-41.

[HO 94-b] Ho, C.J., Lau H.S., 1994. Evaluating the impact of lead time uncertainty in material requirement planning systems. European journal of operational research, 75 (1), 89-99.

[HO 95-a] Ho, C. -J., Law, W.-K., Rampla, R., 1995. Uncertainty-dampening methods for reducing MRP system nervousness. International Journal of Planning and Control, 33 (2), 483-96.

[HO 95-b] Ho, C.J., 1995. Examining the impact of demand lumpiness on the lot-sizing performance in MRP systems. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (9), 2579-99.

[HO 96] Ho, C.J., Carter, L., 1996. An investigation of alternative dampening procedures to cope with MRP nervousness. International Journal of Production Research, 34 (1), 137-56.

[HO 98] Ho, C.J., 1998. Correlating MRP system nervousness with forecast errors. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (8), 2285-99.

[HO 99] Ho, C.J., 1999. Evaluating the effectiveness of using lot-sizing mies to cope with MRP system nervousness. International Journal of Planning Control, 10 (2), 150-61.

[HSU 91] HSU, J., 1991, Integrating safety stock and lot-sizing policies for multi-stage inventory systems under uncertainty. Journal of Business Logistics, 12 (2), 221-36.

[INM 97] Inman, R. R., Gonsalvez, D. J., 1997. The causes of schedule instability in an automotive supply chain. Journal of Production and Inventory Management, 38 (2), 26-32.

[JEU 00] Jeunet, J., Jonard N., 2000. Measuring the performance of lot-sizing techniques in uncertain environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 64 (1-3), 197-208.

[JEU 06] Jeunet J., 2006. Demand forecast accuracy and performance of inventory policies under multi-level rolling schedule environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (1), 401-19.

[KAB 09] Kabak, K. E, Ornek, A.M., 2009. An improved metric for measuring multi-item multi-level schedule instability under rolling schedules. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56 (2), 691-707

[KAD 95-a] Kadipasaoglu, S.N., Sridharan, V., 1995. Alternative approaches for reducing schedule instability in multistage manufacturing under demand uncertainty. Journal of Operations Management, 13 (3), 193-11.

[KAD 95-b] Kadipasaoglu, S.N., 1995. The effect of freezing the master production schedule on cost in multilevel MRP systems. International Journal of Production and Inventory Management Journal, 36 (3), 30-6.

[KAD 97] Kadipasaoglu, S. N., Sridharan, S. V., 1997. Measurement of instability in multi-level MRP systems. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (3), 713-37.

[KER 96] Kern, G.M., Wei, J.C., 1996. Master production rescheduling policy in capacity-constrained just-in-time make-to-stock. Decision Sciences, 27 (2), 365-87.

[KOH 00] Koh S.C., Jones, M. H., Saad, S. M., Arunachalam, S., Gunasekaran, A., 2000. Measuring uncertainties in MRP environments. International Journal of Logistics Information Management, 13 (3), 177-83.

[KOH 02] Koh, S. C., L. Saad S., M., Joness, M. H., 2002. Uncertainty under MRP-planned manufacture: review and categorization. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (10), 2399-421.

[LEE 86] Lee, T. S., Everett, E., Adam, J. R., 1986. Forecasting error evaluation in material requirements planning (MRP) production inventory systems. Management Sciences, 32 (9), 1186-205.

[LIN 94-a] Lin, N-P, Krajewski, L., Leong, G.K., Benton, W.C., 1994. The effects of environmental factors on the design of master production scheduling systems. Journal of Operations Management, 11 (4), 367-84.

[LIN 94-b] Lin, C., Madu, C.N., Kuei, C.H., 1994. Experimental design and regression analysis in simulation: an automated flowline case study. Microelectronics and Reliability, 34 (5), 845-61.

[LUC 85] Luc, G. Chalmet, De bodt, M., Van Wassenhove, L., 1985. The effect of engineering changes and demand uncertainty on MRP lot sizing: a case study. International Journal of Production Research, 23 (2), 233-51.

[MAH 09] Mandavi, I., Shirazi, B., Solimanpur, M., Sahebjamnia, N., 2009. Lot size approximation based on minimising total delay in a shop with multi-assembly products. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (10), 2685-703.

[MAT 77] Mather, U., 1977. Reschedule the reschedules you just rescheduled - Way of the life for MRP? Production and Inventory Management, 18 (1), 60-79.

[MEI 05] Meixell., J. M., 2005. The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study. International Journal of Production Economics, 95 (1), 95-107.

[MEL 85] Melnyk, S. A., Piper, C. J., 1985. Lead time errors in MRP: the lot-sizing effect. International Journal of Production Research, 23 (2), 253-64.

[MET 99] Metters, R. D., Vargas, V., 1999. A comparison of production scheduling policies on costs, service levels, and schedule changes. Production and Operations Management, 8 (1), 76-91.

[MIN 85] Minifie, J.R., Heard, E, 1985. On the generalizability of MRP simulation results. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 9 (1-3), 211-17.

[MIN 86] Minifie, J.R., Davis, R..A., 1986. Survey of MRP nervousness issues. International Journal of Production and Inventory Management, 27 (3), 111-20.

[MIN 90] Minifie, J.R., Davi,s R.A., 1990. Interaction effects on MRP nervousness. International journal of Production Research, 28 (1), 173-83.

[MOH 05] Mohebbi, E., Choobineh, F., 2005. The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty, International journal of Management Science, 33 (6), 472-82.

[MOL 98] Molinder, A., Olhager„ J., 1998. The effect of MRP lot sizing on actual cumulative lead times in multi-level systems. International journal of Production Planning, 9 (3), 293-302.

[MUL 06] Mula, J., Poler, R., Garcia, S., Lario F. C., 2006. Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. International Journal of Production Economics , 103 (1), 271-85.

[MUR 91] Murthy, D.N.P., Ma, L., 1991. MRP with uncertainty: a review and some extensions. International Journal of Production Economics, 25 (1-3), 51-64.

[ORL 75] Orlicky, J., 1975. Material requirements planning, McGraw-Hill, New York.

[PUJ 04] Pujawan, I. N., 2004. The effect of lot sizing rules on order variability. European Journal of Operational Research, 159 (3), 617-35.

[RAM 01] Ram, G., Boone, T., . Stenger, A. J., 2001. The impact of inventory and how planning, parameters on supply chain performance: An exploratory study. International Journal of Production Economics, 71 (1-3), 111-118.

[ROY 84] Roy, B., Vincke, P., 1984. Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo¬criteria: some new concepts and results .Management Science, 30 (11), 1323-35.

[SAH 08] Sahin, F. E., Robinson, P., Gao L.-L., 2008. Master production scheduling policy and rolling schedules in a two-stage make-to-order supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 115 (2), 528-41.

[SEL 06] Selçuk, B., Fransoo, J. -C., De Kok, A.G., 2006. The effect of updating lead times on the performance of hierarchical planning systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 104 (2), 427-40.

[SHO 93] Shoshana, A., 1993. Single machine lot-sizing with uniform yields and rigid demands: robustness of the optimal solution. IIE Transactions, 27 (5), 625-33.

[SRI 87] Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., Udayabhanu, V., 1987. Freezing the master production schedule under rolling planning horizons. Decision Sciences, 33 (9), 1137-49.

[SRI 88] Sridharan, V., Berry, W. L., Udayabhanu, V., 1988. Measuring master production schedule stability under rolling planning horizons, Decision Sciences, 19 (1), 147-66.

[SRI 89] Sridharan, V., LaForge, R.L., 1989. The impact of safety stock on schedule instability, cost and service. International Journal of Operations Management, 8 (4), 327-47.

[SRI 90-a] Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., 1990. Master production scheduling make-to-stock products: a framework for analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 28 (3), 541-58.

[SRI 90-b] Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., 1990. Freezing the master production schedule under demand uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 21 (1), 97-120.

[SRI 94] Sridharan, V., LaForge, R.L., 1994. A model to estimate service levels when a portion of the master production schedule is frozen. Computers & Operations Research, 21 (5), 477-86.

[STE 76] Steele, D. C., 1976. The nervous MRP system. How to battle? Production and Inventory Management, 16 (4), 83-89.

[STE 95] Steele, D.C., Berry, W.L., Chapman S.N., 1995. Planning and control in multi-cell manufacturing. Decision Sciences, 26 (1), 1-34.

[YEN 96] Venkataraman, R., Yuehwern, Yih, Chang-Yung, Liu, 1996. Frequency of replanning in a rolling horizon master production schedule for a process industry environnent: a case study. International Journal of Production and Operations Management, 5 (3), 255-65.

[VOL 97] Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., Whybark, D. C., 1997. Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems, ISBN 0-256-13899-0.

[WHY 76] Whybark, D. C., Williams, J., 1976. Material requirements planning under uncertainty. Decision Science, 7 (4), 595-606.

[XIE 03] Xie, J., Zhao, X., Lee, T.S., 2003. Freezing the master production schedule under single constraint and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 83 (1), 65-84.

[XIE 04] Xie, J., Lee, T.S., Zhao, X., 2004. Impact of forecasting error on the performance of capacited multi-item production systems. Computers & Engineering, 46 (2), 205-19.

[YAN 87] Yano, C. A., Carlson, R. C., 1987. Interaction between frequency of rescheduling and the role of safety stock in material requirements planning systems. International Journal of Production Research, 25 (2), 221-32.

[YAV 95] Yavuz, I.H., Satir, A., 1995. A kanban-based simulation study of a mixed model just-in¬time manufacturing line. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (4), 1027-48.

[YEU 03] Yeung, J. H. Y., Ma, L., Law, J. S., 2003. The impact of using multiple freeze fences on costs in MRP systems. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (10), 2201-28.

[YEU 98] Yeung, J. H. Y., Wong, W. C. K., Ma, L., 2000. Parameters affecting the effectiveness of MRP systems: a review. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (2), 313-331.

[ZHA 01] Zhao, X., Lai, F., Lee, T. S., 2001. Evaluating of safety stock methods in multilevel material requirements planning (MRP) systems. International Journal of Planning and Control, 12 (8), 794-803.

[ZHA 93] Zhao, X., Lee, T.S., 1993. Freezing the master production schedule for material requirements planning systems under demand uncertainty. Journal of Operations Management, 11 ( 2), 185-205.

[ZHA 95] Zhao, X., Goodale, J.C., Lee, T.S., 1995. Lot-sizing rules and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems under demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (8), 1678-89.

[ZHA 96] Zhao, X., Lee, T. S., 1996. Freezing the master production schedule in multilevel material requirements planning systems under deterministic demand. International Journal of Planning and Control, 7 (2), 144-161.

[ZHA 97] Zhao, X., Kokin, L., 1997. Lot-sizing rules and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 53 (3), 281-305.

Téléchargements

Publiée

01-03-2011

Comment citer

DAMAND, D., BARTH, M., & DKHIL, A. (2011). Paramétrage de la méthode mrp en environnement incertain : une revue de la littérature. Revue Française De Gestion Industrielle, 30(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.53102/2011.30.01.808

Rubrique

Article

Statistiques

Vues: 32
Téléchargements: 5